<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BlogMouth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth</link>
	<description>Say something fresh!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Use of Stingray Devices by Law Enforcement Agencies by Elenore</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2011/09/28/we-dont-need-no-stinkin-search-warrants/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Elenore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=653#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be naive! Look at what smart phones do today! Really, Seriously! smh! Americans can&#039;t stand not knowing and big brother is obviously listening and humm StingRay II that means there had to be a StingRay I!!!! But then again.....what do most of us have to hide...not much (lmbo) Sooooo can you say Constitution???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be naive! Look at what smart phones do today! Really, Seriously! smh! Americans can&#8217;t stand not knowing and big brother is obviously listening and humm StingRay II that means there had to be a StingRay I!!!! But then again&#8230;..what do most of us have to hide&#8230;not much (lmbo) Sooooo can you say Constitution???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Small Business Internet Phone Service by internet phone service</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2011/03/18/small-business-internet-phone-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>internet phone service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=583#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>This is the nice blog post for the internet phone service blog &amp; great information in this blog thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the nice blog post for the internet phone service blog &amp; great information in this blog thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stephen Hawking&#8217;s Scientific Blasphemy by Chairman Bill</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2010/09/04/stephen-hawkings-scientific-blasphemy/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Chairman Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=501#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>&quot;This really made me laugh, the idea that the Universe could have sprung out of nothingness is as fanciful as string theory. One of science’s major tenets, the conservation of energy, states that nothing can be created or destroyed out of nothing and now Stephen Hawking is claiming that the perhaps our universe and perhaps multiple universes sprung out of a void. This is scientific blasphemy!!!&quot;

I&#039;m afraid you&#039;re mistaken in this. You should read some David Deutsche or Richard Feynman on quantum mechanics.

Particles are winking into and out of existence continually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This really made me laugh, the idea that the Universe could have sprung out of nothingness is as fanciful as string theory. One of science’s major tenets, the conservation of energy, states that nothing can be created or destroyed out of nothing and now Stephen Hawking is claiming that the perhaps our universe and perhaps multiple universes sprung out of a void. This is scientific blasphemy!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;re mistaken in this. You should read some David Deutsche or Richard Feynman on quantum mechanics.</p>
<p>Particles are winking into and out of existence continually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slave Technology by BlahBlog</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2011/01/20/slave-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>BlahBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=575#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>The Electronic Frontier Foundation recently posted an analysis of how social media shares users data with law enforcement agencies.  &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/social-media-and-law-enforcement-who-gets-what&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Media and Law Enforcement: Who Gets What Data and When?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Electronic Frontier Foundation recently posted an analysis of how social media shares users data with law enforcement agencies.  <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/social-media-and-law-enforcement-who-gets-what" rel="nofollow">Social Media and Law Enforcement: Who Gets What Data and When?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stupid Security Questions by J Dunn</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2010/03/27/stupid-security-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>J Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=430#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>Users should be able to create their own secondary security questions. That way, they alone can be responsible for the future effectiveness of such questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Users should be able to create their own secondary security questions. That way, they alone can be responsible for the future effectiveness of such questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arizona SB 1070 is Hate Law by BlogMouth : Predicate Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2010/04/25/arizona-sb-1070-is-hate-law/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogMouth : Predicate Philosophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 17:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=451#comment-999</guid>
		<description>[...] foundation to a person&#8217;s argument is often based on biased. The current debate behind and the Arizona State Bill 1070 are based on bias, fear, misunderstanding. Arizona State Bill 1070 equates Mexican migrants, which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] foundation to a person&#8217;s argument is often based on biased. The current debate behind and the Arizona State Bill 1070 are based on bias, fear, misunderstanding. Arizona State Bill 1070 equates Mexican migrants, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media Top Links February 2010: Google Buzz Privacy Debacle by BlogMouth : Social Media Top Links March 2010: Zuckerberg Hacks Email Accounts</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2010/03/01/social-media-top-links-february-2010-google-buzz-privacy-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogMouth : Social Media Top Links March 2010: Zuckerberg Hacks Email Accounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 07:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=404#comment-986</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Media Top Links February 2010: Google Buzz Privacy Debacle    Enjoy and Share: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Media Top Links February 2010: Google Buzz Privacy Debacle    Enjoy and Share: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powned Internet Terms of Service by BlogMouth : Social Media Top Links March 2010: Zuckerberg Hacks Email Accounts</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2010/03/28/powned-internet-terms-of-service/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogMouth : Social Media Top Links March 2010: Zuckerberg Hacks Email Accounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 07:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=435#comment-985</guid>
		<description>[...] Powned Internet Terms of Service [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Powned Internet Terms of Service [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Subscription Model Fail Whale by Andrew Warner</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2010/03/13/subscription-model-fail-whale/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=424#comment-973</guid>
		<description>I appreciate this feedback because you actually use your real site to do give it. Lots of people who criticize this move did it behind fake names.

You talked about newsweek&#039;s apparent failure, but you didn&#039;t balance it by discussing the sites that successfully charge. I&#039;ve interviewed many of Mixergy, lynda.com for example. But there are many others, like VentureHacks.com

As for pulling the wool over your eyes, I&#039;m sorry you&#039;re surprised. I could have done a better job of letting people know. I&#039;ve said in many past interviews -- and so have my guests -- that I plan to charge. But I flipped the switch on the premium service before I told people about it. It was an accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate this feedback because you actually use your real site to do give it. Lots of people who criticize this move did it behind fake names.</p>
<p>You talked about newsweek&#8217;s apparent failure, but you didn&#8217;t balance it by discussing the sites that successfully charge. I&#8217;ve interviewed many of Mixergy, lynda.com for example. But there are many others, like VentureHacks.com</p>
<p>As for pulling the wool over your eyes, I&#8217;m sorry you&#8217;re surprised. I could have done a better job of letting people know. I&#8217;ve said in many past interviews &#8212; and so have my guests &#8212; that I plan to charge. But I flipped the switch on the premium service before I told people about it. It was an accident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Networking Bill of Rights by BlogMouth : Social Media Top Links February 2010: Google Buzz Privacy Debacle</title>
		<link>http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/2010/02/19/social-networking-bill-of-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogMouth : Social Media Top Links February 2010: Google Buzz Privacy Debacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogzenze.com/blogmouth/?p=377#comment-955</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Networking Bill of Rights [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Networking Bill of Rights [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

